De-extinction brings up many ethical questions on what it could mean for future conservation efforts. Is it ethical for humankind to resurrect extinct animals? This assignment will help you explore these questions further. Use the resources in the Knowledge Check section of the Resurrection Science student esheet to help you prepare for the debate
In addition to the resources on the student esheet, you also can read the introduction to the Resurrection Science book and appropriate chapters. Pick one of the questions and pick which side of the debate you will defend. Follow the debate guidelines.
- The main argument is given in an introductory statement, with two specific points stated without going into too much detail. For example: “Genetically modified organisms born in a laboratory will share the same essence of the previous living organism because of A and B.” Each side will present an introductory statement while the other side takes notes on the specific points.
- The rebuttal: the opposing teams will refute the specific points by going into more detail and using researched information.
- The closing statement is made by repeating the main idea and stating the specific reasons.
- Do you think a genetically modified organism born in a laboratory will share the same essence of the previous living organism?
- Should we let natural processes of extinction take their course and instead focus our effort on preventing future extinctions rather than resurrecting extinct animals?
- Should the conservation of a species ever be put above the needs of humans?
- Do you agree it is important to save endangered species unless it conflicts with economic interests?
- All organisms have intrinsic value, or telos, that is their own and independent of its usefulness to humans.
- Conservation is a costly “high-class problem.”
- Captive breeding is detrimental to organisms with few successful attempts to return them to their natural habitat and therefore should not be done.